|
Project abstract:
The laying hens husbandry and exploitation, using conventional cage batteries will be forbidded in the near future, despite the fact that this technology is still applied in more than 70% of the laying hens flocks across the world.
Since the very beginning of 80s, certain so called alternative rearing systems have been designed and applied, in order to provide better comfort conditions to the fowl used for eggs or meat production.
These new technological concepts were not sufficiently tested within production conditions, although they fulfill most of the birds welfare requirements. Therefore, it is not fully known how they influence the well being or dicomfort status of the hens.
This project has as mai goal to study the morpho-productive, physiologic, anatomo-histologic and behavioral adaptability of the laying hens at those conditons provided by certain different alternative rearing system, either with vertical (improved cage batteries) or horizontal (permanent litter, with acces to an outer paddock) disposition.
Our study will focus on the dynamics of the fowl productive capacity, on their health status and on the main blood parameters, as well as on the eventually behavioral alterations, as responses to a new life habitat. In order to accomplish these, two laying hens hybrids will be tested, as they will be raised in three versions of alternaive systems (improved cages, opened cages and halls providing acces toward external paddocks), versions which provide higher freedom of movement, access to certain facilities (nests, resting poles, sand baths etc.), the posibility to exteriorise certain natural instinct and, of course, full acces to the natural living environment.
Research team:
Name and surname
|
Didactic/scientific title
|
Fields of expertize
|
Contact address
|
USTUROI Marius Giorgi (CV)
|
Prof. PhD
|
-Poultry science
-Animal products processing technology
|
umg@uaiasi.ro
|
BOIŞTEANU Paul Corneliu (CV)
|
Prof. PhD
|
-Animals physiology
-Meat and meat products technology |
paulb@uaiasi.ro
|
POP Ioan Mircea (CV)
|
Prof. PhD
|
-Animals nutrition and feeding
-Special zootechnics
|
popim@uaiasi.ro
|
DOLIŞ Marius Gheorghe (CV)
|
Lecturer PhD
|
-Ethology
-General zootechnics
|
mariusdolis@yahoo.com
|
RADU-RUSU Răzvan Mihail (CV)
|
Assist. PhD
|
-Poultry science
-Anatomy and histology
|
rprobios@yahoo.com
|
Young researchers involvement degree:
Stage
|
Young researches
|
Activities
|
Hours worked
|
Tasks acomplishment degree
|
Published scientific papers
|
Participation in external mobilities
|
2007
|
Asist.dr. RADU-RUSU Răzvan Mihail
|
Study of national and international laws related to the intensive fowl exploitation
|
160
|
full
|
-
|
-
|
Study of the technical features of alternative rearing systems tested in laying hens
|
full
|
2008
|
Asist.dr. RADU-RUSU Răzvan Mihail
|
Implementation of the technical conditions for the fowl accomodation in certain versions of alternative husbandry systems
|
458
|
full
|
2
|
-INRA
France (Poultry Science
Unit-Tours)
|
Recording of the morpho-productive parameters achieved by the studied fowl (genotype A)
|
full
|
Assessment of the morphological, physico-chemical and microbiological quality traits of the laid eggs (genotype A)
|
full
|
Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative meat production issued at fowl slaughtering(genotype A)
|
full
|
2009
|
Asist.dr. RADU-RUSU Răzvan Mihail
|
Recording of the morpho-productive parameters achieved by the studied fowl (genotype B)
|
178
|
full
|
2 |
-5th International Poultry Conference, Egipt
-8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Italia
-60th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal
Production, Spania
|
Assessment of the morphological, physico-chemical and microbiological quality traits of the laid eggs (genotype B)
|
full |
2010 |
Asist.dr. RADU-RUSU Răzvan Mihail
|
Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative meat production issued at fowl slaughtering (genotype B)
|
283 |
full |
2 |
XIII European Poultry Conference, Tours, France |
Assessment of the morpho-structural alterations in the somatic musculature (genotype B) |
full |
Design of the final evaluation report
|
full
|
Goals and activities within the project:
Stage
|
Goal
|
Activity
|
Acomplishment degree
|
totally
|
partially
|
unacomplished
|
2007 (single)
|
1. Study of the policies involved in poultry welfare concept promoting in modern aviculture
|
1.1. Study of national and international laws related to the intensive fowl exploitation
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
1.2. Study of the worldwide trends related to poultry husbandry and exploitation
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
1.3. Study of the rearing systems and technologies, applied in laying hens husbandry, in Romania
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2. Study of the alternative rearing systems and their impact on the fowl
|
2.1. Study of the technical features of alternative rearing systems tested in laying hens
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.2. Study of the effects exerted by the alternative systems on laying hens productivity, healt status and behaviour
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.3. Evaluation of the run activities and the design of the yearly activity report
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2008 (single)
|
1. Comparative study of the existing data and the design of experiments
|
1.1. Comparative study of the data existing in literature, related to the laying hens rearing within the alternative systems
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
1.2. Choose of experimental version, in accordance with the proposed goals
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
1.3. Implementation of the technical conditions for the fowl accomodation in certain versions of alternative husbandry systems
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
1.4. Acquisition of biological material, brooding and starting of experiments
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2. Assessment of the morpho-productive response of the genotype A at the provided rearing conditions
|
2.1. Assessment of eggs yield and of laying intensity
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.2. Assessment of morphological, physico-chemical and microbiological quality traits, on the laid eggs
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.3. Study of the body weight and feed consumption dynamics
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
3. Assessment of the behavioral response of the genotype A at the provided rearing conditions
|
3.1. Study of the fowl social behaviour
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
3.2. Assessment of casualties and morbidity in the studied birds
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
3.3. Evaluation of the run activities and the design of the yearly activity report
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2009 (single)
|
1. Evaluation of the genotype A reactivity at the provided rearing conditions
|
1.1. Analysis of haematological traits, on age periods
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
1.2. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative meat production issued at fowl slaughtering
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.Assessment of the morpho-productive response of the genotype B at the provided rearing conditions
|
2.1. Assessment of eggs yield and of laying intensity
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.2. Assessment of morphological, physico-chemical and microbiological quality traits, on the laid eggs
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
2.3. Study of the body weight and feed consumption dynamics
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
3. Assessment of the behavioral response of the genotype B at the provided rearing conditions |
3.1. Study of the fowl social behaviour
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
3.2. Assessment of casualties and morbidity in the studied birds |
x |
- |
- |
2010 (single) |
1. Evaluation of the genotype B reactivity at the provided rearing conditions |
1.1. Analysis of biochemical traits, on age periods
|
x |
- |
- |
1.2. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative meat production issued at fowl slaughtering
|
x |
- |
- |
1.3. Assessment of the morpho-structural alterations in the somatic musculature |
x |
- |
- |
2. Overall assessment of the run activities |
2.1. Gathering of the achieved data and their distribution on evaluation groups |
x |
- |
- |
2.2. Statistical analysis of the results |
x |
- |
- |
2.3. Compararation of the achieved data with the information in the reference literature |
x |
- |
- |
3. Final analysis of the achieved results |
3.1. Causal debate of the achieved results |
x |
- |
- |
3.2. Concluding on the run researches |
x |
- |
- |
3.3. Design of the final project report
|
x
|
-
|
-
|
Achieved results:
* during 2008: Research report (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
* during 2009: Research report (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
* during 2010:
Research report (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
* FINAL REPORT: Research report (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
Published articles:
* during 2008: Published papers (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
* during 2009: Published papers (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
* during 2010:
Published papers (you need to install Adobe Reader in order to view file)
|
|